Wednesday, 24 September 2008

Why I Would Be A Terrible Agent

In the few months since I started this blog, at least four writers have told me that I would make a fabulous agent, and have asked if I’ve ever considered becoming one.

Well, no, I haven't, and here's why. I'm a writer, and that's what I'm happy doing.

But there's more to it than that. I don't have the experience, contacts or tact to be an agent, even if I did have the talent. An agent has to be able to nurture and encourage talented writers; to negotiate a contract; and to match books and writers with editors and publishers, which alone takes far more time and skill than I have.

3 comments:

  1. I've sometimes thought it might be fun to try being an actor, a private investigator, a figure skater, a psychologist or even a lawyer (the kind who reduces suspects to a quivering jelly in the witness stand, not the kind who draws up patent contracts).

    I've NEVER thought it might be fun to be a literary agent.

    Draw your own conclusions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Still, it seems to me that if one lives in a state that borders another country one is therefore qualified as a foreign policy expert, then if you've ever rubbed shoulders or shaken hands with a literary agent, you must be even more qualified for that job.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Marian, you reminded me of that joke that ends, "But I'm not a REAL welder," which I can't post in full because it's too rude and would make me blush.

    Paul, thinking a little more along those lines I should also qualify as a doctor as not only have I shaken hands with a few, but I live next door to one! It's a scary thought.

    ReplyDelete

How Publishing Really Works has now moved to its own domain which you can find here. In order to keep everything tidy I've closed comments on this blog, but the discussions continue at the new location. I look forward to seeing you there.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.